Video records are better to learn about the way other people in the world lives than written documents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It seems to be an increasingly widespread controversy about the method of learning in people nowadays, video records are better than written documents. I do not agree with this point of view because of the following reasons.
First of all, video records can not assist learners to commit information to memory. The activity of watching videos will make learners become more lazy, lack motivation. They have just understood lessons in the moment they are watching it and whenever the videos ends, they definitely remember nothing. Besides the less knowledge they acquire, learners are also distracted by other factors which affect concentration, such as: Facebook, Instagram or Tiktok. Using a phone or laptop to study through video records is the main reason that learners can easily switch to above social media to entertain themself.
Another problem of watching video recordings to study is that their eyesight will become worse and worse. In today's modern society, phones or computers play an important role in most people 's lives. They not only support humans in calling or messaging for a long distance, phones or computers also improve their work speed. Therefore, people always spend a lot of time keeping their eyes glued to the screens. According to a survey, the amount of time a person uses a phone or computer a day is at least 7 hours. Long usage time combined with blue light from the screen will make human eyesight decline rapidly.
In short, studying through video records is not as effective as writing documents. Learners should put aside electronic devices and put their head on books or other study documents to save time as well as gain more knowledge. And if you use your phone or computer to study, you had better find the information that does not appear in your study documents.
It seems to be an increasingly widespread controversy about the method of learning in people nowadays, video records are better than written documents. I do not agree with this point of view because of the following reasons.
First of all, video records can not assist learners to commit information to memory. The activity of watching videos will make learners become more lazy, lack motivation. They have just understood lessons in the moment they are watching it and whenever the videos ends, they definitely remember nothing. Besides the less knowledge they acquire, learners are also distracted by other factors which affect concentration, such as: Facebook, Instagram or Tiktok. Using a phone or laptop to study through video records is the main reason that learners can easily switch to above social media to entertain themself.
Another problem of watching video recordings to study is that their eyesight will become worse and worse. In today's modern society, phones or computers play an important role in most people 's lives. They not only support humans in calling or messaging for a long distance, phones or computers also improve their work speed. Therefore, people always spend a lot of time keeping their eyes glued to the screens. According to a survey, the amount of time a person uses a phone or computer a day is at least 7 hours. Long usage time combined with blue light from the screen will make human eyesight decline rapidly.
In short, studying through video records is not as effective as writing documents. Learners should put aside electronic devices and put their head on books or other study documents to save time as well as gain more knowledge. And if you use your phone or computer to study, you had better find the information that does not appear in your study documents.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-19 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
- The graph shows the number of marriages and divorces in the UK between 1975 and 2000 67
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 73
- The picture illustrates how a medical centre changed after some developments in 2010 compared to 2008 61
- Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments rather than private companies To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The table describes the changes of people who went for international travel in 1990 1995 2000 and 2005 million Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...view because of the following reasons. First of all, video records can not assi...
^^^
Line 2, column 208, Rule ID: IN_THE_MOMENT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'at the moment' (=currently)?
Suggestion: at the moment
...tion. They have just understood lessons in the moment they are watching it and whenever the v...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e social media to entertain themself. Another problem of watching video record...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l make human eyesight decline rapidly. In short, studying through video records...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, if, so, therefore, well, at least, in short, such as, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99668874172 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54283292772 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609271523179 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.3260835787 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.3125 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245240959571 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0809651591221 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137355636823 0.0667982634062 206% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187296692514 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.180839742929 0.056905535591 318% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.