It is important for people to take risks, both in their personal lives and professional lives. Do you think the advantages of taking risk outweigh the disadvantages.
Taking risks plays a crucial role in people’s life or even in their work issues. In other words, the latent need of every business is trial and error that lies in being a risk taker. This issue has beneficial results; I subscribe to the notion that as a side-line of benefits, some risks may have some imperfect results. I shall mention that some merits far outweigh the demerits.
On the one hand, the main reason that taking risks can convert into catastrophe is avoiding analyzing all factors to arrive at an infinitesimal risk. Undoubtedly, taking risks has been around for decades in every professional life. Therefore it needs to be practical. Otherwise, deciding without a plan, and escaping from the responsibility of tasks and above all considering them taking risks leads to calamitous consequences. For example, in a company, if staff take a risk without any consultant, production can do damage. As a result, observing the decisions from every angle diminish the inevitable damage.
On the other hand, there are benefits to being a risk taker. Firstly, the more situations require rapid action, the more taking risks can help people. To illustrate, in world war II, all the seniors had been risk-taking. In 1958 all soldiers needed a plan to preserve their country. Hence, in this circumstance, a person who is a risk taker can turn around the game.
To conclude, this begs the question of whether being a risk taker can provide society with improvements. As these factors mentioned, all the acts without seeing the framework of the results can be affected reversely. Contrary, in some cases, being a risk taker encompasses practical and rapidly positive results.
- It is important for people to take risks both in their personal lives and professional lives Do you think the advantages of taking risk outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You sho 84
- Write an essay indicating to what extent you agree or disagree with the statement below Limits should be set on the amount of time children spend looking at screens 73
- Some think that printed books are not necessary in the digital era because all writing can be stored electronically Others think printed books still play an important role Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- The map below shows the future plan the Biology school in a particular university Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 233, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...for decades in every professional life. Therefore it needs to be practical. Otherwise, de...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 24, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...und the game. To conclude, this begs the question of whether being a risk taker can provide society ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, may, so, therefore, for example, as a result, in other words, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06834532374 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82131133155 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60071942446 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2649470427 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.2777777778 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4444444444 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72222222222 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274835856881 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0904128146644 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720971450029 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167695505825 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0701245926867 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.