Should education and healthcare be free of charge and funded by the government, or should it be the responsibility of the people to pay for these services?
Education and healthcare are crucial for individual well-being and societal progress. There is ongoing debate about whether the government should fund these services or individuals should pay for them. However, I firmly believe that it is the government's responsibility to provide free education and healthcare.
Firstly, everyone should have access to education and healthcare as a basic human right, regardless of their financial means. Free provision of these services ensures that all citizens have equal opportunities to improve their lives and contribute to society. For instance, people from disadvantaged backgrounds who cannot afford advanced education or medical treatment can still access these services and live healthy and prosperous lives.
Secondly, free education and healthcare can promote social equity and cohesion. If only the wealthy can afford these services, it creates a socioeconomic divide and contributes to inequalities and a fragmented society. Conversely, free access to these services cultivates a more equal and fair society, wherein everyone has the opportunity to succeed, irrespective of their financial background.
Moreover, providing free education and healthcare can have long-term benefits for a country. A healthy and educated population can contribute to a more productive workforce, fostering economic growth and development. For example, a country with a high literacy rate and healthy citizens is more likely to attract investments, creating job opportunities and generating wealth. Despite the argument that funding these services imposes a financial burden on the government, I believe that the benefits of providing free education and healthcare outweigh the costs. Investing in these services can lead to long-term benefits, such as increased productivity, reduced healthcare costs, and a fairer society.
In conclusion, education and healthcare are fundamental services that should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their financial status. By providing these services free of charge, the government can promote social cohesion, equality, and contribute to the progress of the nation. Therefore, I strongly support the provision of free education and healthcare by the government.
- Should education and healthcare be free of charge and funded by the government or should it be the responsibility of the people to pay for these services 73
- should education and Healthcare be free of charge and funded by government or should it be the responsibility of the people to pay for these services 67
- Should education and healthcare be free of charge and funded by the government or should it be the responsibility of the people to pay for these services 73
- Should education and healthcare be free of charge and funded by the government or should it be the responsibility of the people to pay for these services 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 244, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...owever, I firmly believe that it is the governments responsibility to provide free educatio...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 10.4138276553 230% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1928.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.96904024768 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13848218893 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513931888545 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 606.6 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5313871199 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.411764706 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88235294118 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.439418898189 0.244688304435 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146414123165 0.084324248473 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.091010639927 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.279202910991 0.151304729494 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141058690262 0.056905535591 248% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.35 12.4159519038 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.