The following pie charts are the comparison of energy production from various sources in France.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart compared statistics of energy manufacture in France, measured by percentage, in 1995 and 2005.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that coal accounted for most of the total energy production in both given years, whereas this proportion of nuclear and other energy is the smallest. In addition, both gas and coal experienced a minor increase in shares and interestingly, the percentage of nuclear also went up considerably. In contrast, petro production witnessed a significant drop.
In 1995, coal contributed nearly 30% of total fuel production and this number of nuclear and other resources only stood at 6,4% and 4.9% respectively. At the same time, both gas and petro held a relatively similar percentage to coal production, adding up to approximately 60% of energy manufacture.
Moving to 2005, it is clear that both coal and gas simultaneously rose to over 30% of total production. Interestingly, nuclear and other energy shared the same upward trend but at a more speedy rate. In contrary, petro proportion had a noticeable decrease for about 10%.
- The following pie charts are the comparison of energy production from various sources in France Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some people think that space exploration is a waste of resources while others think that it is essential for mankind to continue to explore the universe in which we live Discuss both views and give your own opinions 92
- Video records are a better way to learn about the way other people in the world live rather than written documents To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person Give reasons f 84
- The first chart below shows the percentages of women and men in a country involved in some kinds of home tasks cooking cleaning pet caring and repairing the house The second chart shows the amount of time each gender spent on each task per day Summarize t 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...uction witnessed a significant drop. In 1995, coal contributed nearly 30% of to...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, whereas, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 926.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29142857143 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15248395746 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582857142857 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.946375853 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.888888889 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4444444444 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0747210691572 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.033152809434 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0312667861089 0.0843802449381 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0517841566194 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250662977075 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.