The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates how many enquiries were received by the Tourist Information Office in one city through three customer service channels during the first six months of 2011.
Overall, the three channels experienced different trends in the time period. While inquiries made in person and over the telephone increased with some fluctuations, the number of email/letter enquires declined over time.
As shown in the graph receiving the number of direct enquiries started at nearly 400 in January. This figure doubled increased in the middle of March and remained constant until April. Then, the number of inquiries made in person witnessed steady growth to approximately 1200 in June. Regarding telephone channels, in January the Tourist Information Office received 800 enquiries from customers, which slightly dropped to 780 in February, but rose again to 800 in March. This figure stood at 800 until witnessing a significant increase to more than 1000 in June.
In contrast to the significant rise in direct inquiries, written enquiries gradually declined over the six-month period. The tourist Information Office received exactly 600 written enquiries in January, followed by a small decrease to around 580 in February. Then, this number fell gradually to about 420 in the middle of April before stabilizing. Subsequently, the figure plummeted to 200 in June.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-26 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Đặng Ngọc Thanh Nhàn | 67 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | vuhungbo | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | vuhungbo | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | vuhungbo | 89 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
.../letter enquires declined over time. As shown in the graph receiving the number...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, regarding, so, then, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1165.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46948356808 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82647044492 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572769953052 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 351.0 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.8723658134 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0833333333 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91666666667 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281612388219 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0900362667105 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0917886422259 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178933343626 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0899152880263 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.15 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.