Directors of large organizations earn much higher salaries than ordinary employees do. Some people think it is necessary, but others hold that it is unfair. Discuss both views and give your own opinions.
In the contemporary age, it is a well-known fact that board managers receive a significantly higher paycheck than their staff while many individuals would oppose it. This essay will elaborate on both views and argue in favour of the former opinion.
On the one hand, being paid much lower than the board of management may appear to be unfair to some employees. The first worth-mentioning argument perhaps is that staffs work for the same amount of time as their bosses and it seems unsatisfied when they are paid less. In some cases, directors even get a more flexible timetable and are not required to show up at the office every day while their employees have to meet the minimum working hours to be paid fully. Furthermore, several positions may not get the commission based on their performance whereas the board always receive a bonus which derives from the annual profit of the company. This can create a sense of discrimination among the staffs and reduce their productivity.
On the other hand, it seems reasonable for directors to earn more money than the average workers due to their workloads and responsibilities within the organization. It is true that directors have to deal with more critical issues and requires more problem-solving skills than the employees. For instance, a mid-level staff can not take care of profound matters such as implementing long-term strategy or improving market share of the company, which are daily discussions in board meetings. In addition, directors hold responsibilities concerning legal issues and corporate social duties. If a major problem occurs, the director have to present it to the stakeholders and take the lead to solve it. This can be extremely risky and demanding for an employee and thus, directors should be highly reward for their effort.
In conclusion, while many people consider that paying directors higher wages than their staff is an unfairness, I belive that the boards should receive worthy salaries which is equivalent to their contribution and duties.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-18 | hyst12 | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-13 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-28 | devanshgera8@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-28 | devanshgera8@gmail.com | 61 | view |
- Handwriting today is less formal than it was in the past What are the causes of this change Is it a positive or negative development 89
- The first chart below shows the percentages of women and men in a country involved in some kinds of home tasks cooking cleaning pet caring and repairing the house The second chart shows the amount of time each gender spent on each task per day Summarize t 73
- Task 2 Some countries achieve international success by building specialised facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Is it a positive or negative development 84
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Some people think that printed books are no longer necessary in this digital era as all writing can be stored electronically Others think that printed books still play important roles Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, thus, well, whereas, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in some cases, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1708.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16012084592 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92135798428 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574018126888 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0891932093 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6428571429 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157968288002 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541472784589 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397710137002 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0973746009361 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0170718498394 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.