The first chart below shows the percentages of women and men in a country involved in some kinds of home tasks (cooking, cleaning, pet caring and repairing the house). The second chart shows the amount of time each gender spent on each task per day. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts depict information about the proportions of females and males in a national engaging in house chores and the amount of time both genders spend doing each housework tasks per day.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is apparent that women cook and clean more than men while the number of men spend time on pet care and house repairs is considerably higher than women. In addition, both women and men spend the highest amount of their time on cooking and by contrast, house repairing takes up the least minutes of their time.
The first graph shows that more than 80% of female citizens take charge in cooking whereas this number of men only accounts for 60%. Furthermore, the percentage of men who fix house equipments contributes to almost 20% of total males engaging in household activities. Noticeablely, this figure of women only makes up to around 8%.
At the same time, women spend averagely more than 80 minutes per day on cooking meals and men spend one hour. Interestingly, males and femals use the similar amount of time to take care of their pets, which is 20 minutes per day. Moreover, repairing house facilities takes men 20 minutes a day but only takes women almost a half of that amount.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-02-17 | honguyenlily | 67 | view |
2023-03-26 | giangngoc | 84 | view |
2023-03-22 | hyst12 | 73 | view |
2021-09-11 | TranMinhDuc | 62 | view |
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 61
- The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometres traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- It is predicted that robots are going to become increasingly important in our life How could robots be used in the future Will this development be a positive or a negative trend 61
- Write an essay indicating to what extent you agree or disagree with the statement below Limits should be set on the amount of time children spend looking at screens 78
- Mobile phone and the internet could have many benefits for old people However this age group uses technology the least What are the benefits for old people of using mobile phones and the internet How can we encourage them to use this new technology 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, look, moreover, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1019.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80660377358 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49874924212 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542452830189 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2912812821 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.222222222 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 5.23603664747 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318739591446 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130412857275 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640191545861 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195371531857 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531125449564 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.