my interpretation of civilization
Good evening, everyone. Today, I want to share with you my interpretation of civilization.
To me, civilization is more than just advanced technology or material wealth. It encompasses the values, beliefs, and behaviors that guide human interaction and shape our collective future.
In China, we have a long history of civilization, with ancient philosophers like Confucius and Laozi laying the foundations for ethical behavior and social harmony. These teachings emphasize the importance of respect, compassion, and humility, which are essential for building a truly civilized society.
However, civilization is not just about looking back at the past. It is also about adapting to the present and preparing for the future. As the world becomes more interconnected and complex, we need to embrace diversity, inclusivity, and innovation, which are key to creating a sustainable and equitable future for all.
For example, in the field of technology, we are seeing tremendous advances in areas like artificial intelligence, renewable energy, and biotechnology. However, these innovations also raise important ethical and social questions that require careful consideration and responsible action. We need to ensure that these technologies are developed and used in ways that benefit all members of society, rather than just a privileged few.
Moreover, civilization is not confined to a single nation or culture. It is a global phenomenon that requires collective action and collaboration. In this sense, the pursuit of civilization is a shared responsibility that transcends borders and identities.
As we face pressing challenges like climate change, poverty, and inequality, it is more important than ever to work together and promote a culture of civilization. This means respecting human dignity, protecting the environment, and promoting social justice, among other things.
For example, the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals provide a framework for addressing these challenges and promoting a more just and sustainable world. By working together and taking action on these goals, we can create a future that is more peaceful, prosperous, and equitable for all.
In conclusion, my interpretation of civilization is based on the fundamental values of respect, compassion, and innovation, which are essential for building a sustainable and equitable future for all. As a Chinese student, I am committed to promoting these values and working with others to create a better world. Thank you.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-28 | butterflyluo | 78 | view |
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 56
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish Discuss both these views and give your 73
- my interpretation of civilization
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, moreover, so, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 10.4138276553 259% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2153.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 377.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71087533156 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28276530771 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 692.1 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 5.43587174349 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 0.809619238477 988% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.2671080325 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.523809524 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9523809524 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.09523809524 7.06120827912 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 9.0 4.38176352705 205% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 8.67935871743 207% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163110003914 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503523526657 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0848740226598 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0831135245261 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0821101921205 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.54 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.