Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish Discuss both these views and give your

Essay topics:

Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

It is constantly debated whether trainees of different proffessions should be allowed to work outside their country of study. While concerns of various aspects exist, I personally contend that the choice of which country to work in is totally up to the students’ free will and that no barriers should exist.

On the one hand, skeptics of allowing professional students to work in any country hold the opinion that it would be a waste of time and money spent on cultivating the trainees to the professional level if they don’t stay and repay their school and country of study. This is definitely one essential factor that is creating doubts. It would also mean a loss of talent if they can’t retain them. Another concern is that confidential skills or data may be leaked to other countries. If one country excels in a particular field, for example, bone repair, when other countries’ students master the skills, the competitive edge of this country would be awakened.

On the other hand, despite the drawbacks mentioned, there are plentiful ways to overcome them and many advantage of allowing students to work where they want exist. First of all, the trainees, such as medical students have already paid a large sum of tuition fees for their studies. So the institutions and the countries have already benefitted from teaching them. Therefore, it would not be fair if restriction on work were still placed. Besides, we are now in a more globalized world and economy. With the skills and expertise learnt from the developed countries, students would work to help developing areas. For example many students from the third world are admitted to Chinese universities every year in hope of receiving better education to construct their home countries. If few countries remain dominant in professional areas, the world would continue to be hugely imbalanced. Finally, finding ideal jobs is dependent on the students’ abilities. Encouraging them to find work not confined to where they were trained would also be advantageous for improving employment rates.

In conclusion, limiting the work of professional students to where they were taught should not be taken. Instead, we should encourage them to work in other countries.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-03 awu212 89 view
2024-05-28 AnnaAlysia 73 view
2024-04-26 123456abcxyz 73 view
2024-03-14 minhnhat2002 78 view
2024-03-14 minhnhat2002 73 view
Essays by user butterflyluo :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 99, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun advantage seems to be countable; consider using: 'many advantages'.
Suggestion: many advantages
...are plentiful ways to overcome them and many advantage of allowing students to work where they...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 595, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to develop' or 'develop'.
Suggestion: to develop; develop
... countries, students would work to help developing areas. For example many students from t...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, finally, first, if, may, so, still, therefore, third, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2107.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 410.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13902439024 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75029499256 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524390243902 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 625.5 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6831516029 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7727272727 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6363636364 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.524410079336 0.244688304435 214% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15772722394 0.084324248473 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.170954597231 0.0667982634062 256% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.363433862166 0.151304729494 240% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.250158159967 0.056905535591 440% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.