Some people think the best way to solve traffic congestion is to provide free public transport 24/7. Do you agree or disagree?
Traffic jams have become one of the most dramatic problems in many metropolitans. Although free public transport is considered as a useful method for this issue, I asserted that this solution is not the ultimate way for reducing traffic congestion.
To begin with, by providing public means of transport without paying a fee, the authorities can reduce the use of private transportations like cars and motorbikes which are the two main reasons for traffic jams. As a result, an enormous number of personal vehicles have created a huge pressure on traffic flow, which caused Moreover, this way can help people with difficult financial circumstances to arrive at their destination anytime they want and it also plays an important role in rush hour solving. For example, if more people take the free public transport in peak times, fewer cars and motorbikes will appear that release more space as well as ease traffic. Furthermore, the traffic accidental rate is lower due to the result of settling traffic overload.
However, there are better solutions to improve this situation despite the argument above. Firstly, working from home should be incentives for people by organisations which could decline the obstruction status. For instance, after the Covid 19 pandemic, most of the firms still require their staff to work remotely in order to prevent the expansion of disease. This action has contributed directly to the traffic flow which reduces the number of participants and also many bottlenecks. Secondly, the government should propagate to citizens about the harmness of personal transportations. Although it is more convenient for people to drive to work or go to school on their own vehicle, the gas emission from means of transport has caused several detrimental effects to their respiratory system.
In conclusion, it is an undeniable fact that provisioning free public transport may be a vital solution for reducing traffic jams, I personally believe that it is not the best solution to the issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-02 | NghiaTran61 | 89 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 224, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n reasons for traffic jams. As a result, an enormous number of personal vehicles ...
^^
Line 2, column 324, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e pressure on traffic flow, which caused Moreover, this way can help people with ...
^^
Line 3, column 587, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e harmness of personal transportations. Although it is more convenient for peopl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1690.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23219814241 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88215507131 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594427244582 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0456648074 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.0 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8461538462 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.0769230769 7.06120827912 199% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193097430361 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067169967302 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557093663584 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131410652146 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510807148878 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.