Some people think that a person improves their intellectual skills more when doing group activities. To what extent do you agree? Use specific details and examples to explain your view.
In recent decades, many researchers have studied the importance of group-level cognition. Indeed, to my mind, there is now convincing evidence that group activities improve the intelligence of individuals. In this essay, I shall examine how research in team-games and study-groups supports this view.
To begin with, team-games clearly require individuals to perform a diverse range of rapid mental calculations. This is because, in a sporting context, players must predict and anticipate possible actions within tight time constraints. For example, a recent Cambridge study showed that soccer players can – within the span of seconds – calculate over a dozen different permutations that could result from a single soccer related action. Such predictive powers clearly improve players' mental abilities and result from activities performed in a group context.
Secondly, study-groups enable individuals to obtain information that they could not acquire in isolation. This is because peer feedback allows individuals to refine their understanding of concepts and to also learn new information from other members in the study-group. For example, a study by The British Institute for Learning found that, if individuals participated in study-groups, they had a far more objective and sophisticated understanding of a topic than learners who were not part of study-groups. Therefore, it is certainly the case that learning in a group improves an individual’s mental abilities.
In conclusion, I strongly agree with the notion that group activities improve intellectual abilities. In the future, we will certainly see schools take greater measures to ensure that more group-level cognition occurs in the classroom.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-04-30 | Radhika Chopra | 60 | view |
2022-04-29 | takimaru | 89 | view |
2021-10-18 | essay0.6 | 70 | view |
2021-07-08 | alhassan11 | 78 | view |
2021-07-08 | ahmed11 | view |
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and includ 78
- The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The following was written as a part of an application for a small business loan by a group of developers in the city of Monroe Jazz music is extremely popular in the city of Monroe over 100 000 people attended Monroe s annual jazz festival last summer and 65
- Some people think that a person improves their intellectual skills more when doing group activities To what extent do you agree Use specific details and examples to explain your view 60
- In recent years many small local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centres or malls to do their shopping Is this a positive or a negative development 61
flaws:
No. of Words: 253 350
more content wanted
==================
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 5.5 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 4 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 253 350
No. of Characters: 1421 1500
No. of Different Words: 156 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.988 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.617 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.113 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 118 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 94 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 65 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 51 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.462 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.056 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.538 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.349 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.579 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.086 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5