It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct. There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. Do you agree or disagree?
It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct. There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. Do you agree or disagree?
It is believed that the extinction of animals are normal, human interference in the phenomenon is thus meaningless. I mostly disagree with the notion as the majority of animals have their roles in the ecosystem, albeit there are certain exceptions.
There are two main merits of safeguarding survial of animals. The first point in support of this view is that, they can provide human with valuable genes. It is common that humanity extract byproducts from animals to serve for human’s well-being. Their uses can come in form of chemical compounds, food, and bones which can be utilized as medicines, accessories, or production inputs of other industrial products. Another justification for intervening the disappearance of animals is to sustain the ecological equilibrium. Some living creatures may not have economic benefits or applications in pharmaceutical and manufacturing industries. They, however, are the beating heart of the existence of other species. Flys, the insects that are often associated with diseases and filth, contribute greatly to natural balance by facilitating decomposing process of organic compounds. They therefore hold the key in reproduction and development of a plethora of flora and fauna.
Admittedly, there are animals whose appearance are at odds with other creatures. Ticks, the blood suckers which thrive on other species could examplify the phenomenon. However, animals bring more harm than good like ticks are few. Protection of animals against natural selection are still of primary importance.
In sum, I almost object to the idea that preservation of fauna is furtile. Even though certain species are a bane of human’s life, most of animals are worth protection of homo sapien.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-02 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | havanas | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-22 | tranquockhanh | 95 | view |
| 2023-07-29 | hien2422006 | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-24 | jasmine.27 | 95 | view |
- It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment of people who are already ill To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 84
- Only reason to work hard is to earn money To what extent you do agree or disagree 84
- Some people think that the best way to improve road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving a car or motorbike To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people say that the main aim of advertising is to improve the sales of products that people do not really need To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 131, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the animals') or simply say ''most animals''.
Suggestion: most of the animals; most animals
...ain species are a bane of human’s life, most of animals are worth protection of homo sapien.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, thus, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38851351351 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99873474354 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7082704985 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.75 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1 7.06120827912 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3365419304 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964436505274 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140616182197 0.0667982634062 211% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247727646037 0.151304729494 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.331590960256 0.056905535591 583% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.39 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.