Some human activities have negative effects on plant and animal species.
Some people think it is too late to do anything about this problem while others think effective measures can be taken to improve this situation.
DISCUSS BOTH VIEWS AND GIVE YOUR OPINION.
The loss of biodiversity is becoming increasingly alarming these days. Some people concern that there is nothing human can do to enhance the movement, while others think human beings still have viable alternatives to tackle the issue. I am supportive of the later argument that human races still have chance to maintain our existence on earth.
One the one hand, some people believe that the loss of wild life is an irreversible trend, and this appear to be well grounded as once living creatures and plants are extinct, there are no ways to bring these animals and plants back to life. An additional point is that human’s activities such as urbanization, expansion of industrial areas contribute to the loss of biodiversity, is happening at the faster pace than ever. Interruption of the processes is impossible because it would cause detrimental impacts on the increasing population.
However, these thinking are flawed as extinct animals can be reintroduced to the wild thanks to the advancement of new technological breakthroughs and the size of the world population is remaining stable. Even though the future seems to be blurred, there are yet feasible options to mitigate the loss of wild life which require the support from both governments and individuals. Firstly, the role of governments are of great importance to intervene the loss of valuable sources of gens in nature. Political leaders are advocating the use of electric vehicle which replaces their conventional counterparts powered by fossil fuels. This would eliminate the effects of climate change on the habitat of animals and vegetation. Likewise, heavy fines and prison sentence are already introduced for organizations and individuals, those may intentionally violate law protecting rare wild animals or flora and fauna. More importantly, governmental programmes could raise the public awareness regarding safeguarding the environment from human’s impacts. In addition to governmental endeavor, individuals are also upholding the preservation of the wild environment by less use of plastic products, or favor an eco-friendly lifestyle. By doing so, they can curb the amount of their carbon footprint thus restrict their affects on the planet include wild animals and trees.
In the light of these facts, the loss of some animals and plants due to human factors can be interrupted by attempts of the authorities and people. Persons are able to fix this issue by new technology and the support from every individuals in society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-02 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
- Many people use written language in a less formal way and in a relaxed way than in the past Why is that so Does this development have more advantages or disadvantages 78
- Solving environmental problems should be the responsibility of one international organization rather than each national government Do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people think that certain old buildings are more worth preserving than the other ones Which types of old buildings should be preserved Do you think that the advantages of preserving these old buildings outweigh the disadvantages 73
- If a product is good or it meets people s needs people will buy it So advertising is unnecessary and no more than entertainment Agree or disagree 89
- Nowadays people use bicycles less as a form of transport Why is that What can we do to encourage people to use bicycles more 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, likewise, may, regarding, so, still, thus, well, while, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2112.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 396.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02093248151 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585858585859 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 671.4 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9284429146 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.235294118 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2941176471 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.82352941176 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227301510069 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623360985148 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740487822777 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142835257017 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373012943789 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.