The plans below show how the ground of a particular building has changed over time. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features.
The diagram illustrates the layout of the ground floor of the building as it had been in 1958,1984 and 1985,2000 and how the same area will look from 2001 to the present after having been developed.
In general, the area had undergone drastic changes in facilities. The most significant difference could be seen in the removal of the particular building and the construction of new facilities.
As its original state, there was a line with myriad facilities on the left and right such as a meeting room, assistant, and secretary office on the left. Furthermore, a kitchen and manager office on the right, while a toilet and reception area was located proximity close to the entrance.
In the following 25 years, all the rows on the left of the apartment, as demolished to make way for the construction of a living room and bathroom, and shower. Additionally, the manager's office and reception area was removed to build bedroom 1 and 2. The remaining feature stayed unchanged.
From 2001 until the present, another transformation could be seen in the removal of the living room to erect gift cards and flower areas, while the bathroom and shower were devastated to put up a new play area. Moreover, bedroom 1 and 2 was destroyed to pave the way for a new office and flower area, while the kitchen still remained over the period.
- The maps below show the center of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development 67
- the graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010 78
- The graph shows information about the average number of visitors entering a museum in summer and winter in 2003 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparison where relevant
- Some people thinks scientific research should focus on solving world health problems Others think that there are more important issues Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- SOME PEOPLE THINK GOVERNMENTS SHOULD CARE MORE ABOUT ELDERLY WHILE OTHERS THINK THEY SHOULD FOCUS ON INVESTING IN EDUCATION FOR YOUNGER PEOPLE DISCUSS BOTH VIEWS AND GIVE YOUR OWN OPINION 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 179, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'managers'' or 'manager's'?
Suggestion: managers'; manager's
...bathroom, and shower. Additionally, the managers office and reception area was removed t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 29, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...unchanged. From 2001 until the present, another transformation could be seen in ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, moreover, still, while, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1102.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79130434783 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76497127699 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54347826087 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 333.0 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7150848399 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.2 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0777743507353 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0354020705656 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0321643520571 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0475996924854 0.15604864568 31% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347808058968 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.