it's better to get a job straight after school. What are the advantages and disadvantages?
It is argued that getting higher education is the best way to a decent job, whilst others disagree and think that this can achieved without a college degree. This essay agrees that those who graduate from a university have a greater success than those who get employed right after secondary school.
Companies that pay well and offer career growth hire only college graduates. That is to say that young people with a school certificate don not have the slightest chance to become chief executive officers of multinational companies, eminent doctors, scientists, or lawyers. It is therefore agreed that knowledge gained at college is the only prospect to get ahead in career. For example, anyone could become a sales manager even if he or she did not receive a university degree, but only one who graduated from Harvard can build a successful career in sales in companies, such as Google.
However, many disagree and feel that knowledge and skills learnt at school are sufficient for a promising career. In fact, knack and desire for work are more valuable than concepts, so if a young man lacks both, a higher degree will not help reach career heights. Despite this, talent and wish are often secondary when it comes to hiring process, which means that Bachelor’s degree still has an advantage. For instance, someone who has talent in drawing or writing even if he or she did not not study at art college can create famous brand, including Gucci or Prada, which will be worn by millions of people worldwide.
In summary, although university credentials are not always key to success in career, a college graduate still has a competitive edge over those who refused from the idea of continuing higher education.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | Nhi3132006 | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Nhi3132006 | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | vidung | 61 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | vidung | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | vidung | 56 | view |
- The reading passage argues that R robustus was unlikely to be a predator However the lecturer provides the evidence in favour of the idea that the stated mammal could have been a successful hunter 70
- The chart illustrates changes in carbon emissions among several countries in 1975 1990 and 2005 73
- The reading states that robustus was a scavenger However the lecturer claims that R robustus was a successful predator because of the three following reasons 81
- Living in large cities today poses many problems for people What are these problems Should governments encourage more people to live in smaller towns 56
- Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 488, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: not
...rawing or writing even if he or she did not not study at art college can create famous ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, so, still, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in fact, in summary, such as, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96539792388 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56945520892 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602076124567 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.4468295962 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.454545455 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2727272727 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3636363636 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.076676782998 0.244688304435 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0313975385111 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394519379871 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0505304383759 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569805621712 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 488, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: not
...rawing or writing even if he or she did not not study at art college can create famous ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, so, still, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in fact, in summary, such as, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96539792388 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56945520892 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602076124567 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.4468295962 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.454545455 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2727272727 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3636363636 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.076676782998 0.244688304435 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0313975385111 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394519379871 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0505304383759 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569805621712 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.