Q Peoples character is influenced by environment rather than genetics Do you agree or disagree

In this rampant age of globalization, the existence of noble characters is mandatory to set the pillar of sincere locality. A central question remains whether the character of a person is shaped by environmental conditions or genetics. Here, I would like to incline in the favour of statement.

To set in, there are numerous points endorsing my view. First and foremost, environment comprising type of educational standard, moral ehics given by parents including value of team spirit, co-operation, respectful behaviour towards pear groups, discipline, toiling hard as well as endorsement and behaviour of society members is the most robust factor to evolve the vintage characteristics of a person. For example, unlike a child living in countryside, an offspring dwelling in a metro city is likely to be advanced, proactive, extrovert, frank and more attracted towards educational approaches.

Furthermore, genetics of an individual may not be powerful enough to protect him from the influential of environment. To illustrate, a child, who is like a blank paper, living in a family of terrorists is anticipated to be violent as his parents will install violent aggression after doing brainwash. Consequently, his chances to be terror are much greater than anything else as it is said that ''one rotten apple spoils the whole lot''.

By contrast, genetics may have their own role to play, however, it is so onerous for a person with a splendid genetics to escape himself from the impact of surroundings. As a result, his actions are given directions by atmosphere rather than genetics. For instance, everyone has to modify himself according to the need of time as most of the people feel happy to follow the renown axiom''do as the romans do''.

In a nutshell, after doing a great deal of thought and deliberations with myself, I would like to assert that type of surroundings determine the character what it like be than genetics.