The shortage of houses in big cities causes many consequences. Only government actions can resolve this problem. Do you agree or disagree with this idea?
the critics argue about the consequences that the shortage of houses in big cities could cause, which can only be solved by the act of the government. To some extent, I advocate this opinion due to the permission of the government.
To begin with, big cities often have a large quantity of civilians, consisted of both people who lived there for years and those who just arrived. Due to that, the need of residents for houses will be more urgent than ever. Because of that, the shortage of houses would cause any big city numerous of problems such as homeless people or degradation of old dormitory due to the overload in numbers of people in the city. for example, in 2017, researchers have stated that because of the skyrocketed of civilians in New York, many old buidings in the center of the city, especially apartments were degraded. And to secure the safety for civilians, those buildings ought to be removed.
With that being stated, the only possible solution that is effective is through the act of government. With their authority, they will be able to build new houses, apartments, dormitories through capital mobilization. Moreover, the government can invest in old buuldings by renovating them, albiet the quality might not as good as the new ones. However, with every new houses built by the act of government, the decrease in numbers of homeless people or those who can not find one to buy is evitable. For example, after a few years of reconstructing old buildings ad create new ones, in 2019, rates of homeless people in New York dipped steeply at about 20% compared to 2 years earlier period.
To sum up what have been stated so far, it is undeniable that government actions played a massive role in solving problems of the shortage of houses. And in my point of view, it can not only solved the problems but can also help the city developed in variety of ways as a result of the previous actions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-27 | student01800155 | 61 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the critics argue about the consequences th...
^^^
Line 2, column 421, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...rload in numbers of people in the city. for example, in 2017, researchers have stat...
^^^
Line 3, column 555, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'buildings'' or 'building's'?
Suggestion: buildings'; building's
...after a few years of reconstructing old buildings ad create new ones, in 2019, rates of h...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 192, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'can' requires base form of the verb: 'solve'
Suggestion: solve
...nd in my point of view, it can not only solved the problems but can also help the city...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, moreover, so, for example, such as, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71130952381 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63415387791 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532738095238 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8274979359 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.071428571 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231623359601 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07589521804 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059405957574 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149683646264 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558289270996 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.