Some people think that it is a waste of money for countries to host big sporting events like the world cup, and that the money would be better spent on other things. However, others think that hosting large sporting events has a clear, positive impact on a country.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
it would be argued by some people that: the money spent on organising several massive sports events like the world cup could be useless for some countries. Others believe that: enormous sporting events would give several commercial benefits for countries. Personally, I am in favour of that events have many terrific impacts on the host nations
some people agree that governments would waste money on hosting large events like the world cup because of two main reasons. First of all, a massive amount of money would invest in facilities in events. Governments would improve and upgrade their facilities when they would like to organise events successfully. For instance, Qatar organised the world cup this year spending a large of money on improving the stadium and equipment for competing during the world cup. Besides, the workforce also has to overwork all day at the stadium to make sure the quality of the match. Secondly, hospitals, schools and public infrastructures would be seemed better for residents to spend money on than other things. Several areas need renovating and improving the pre-existing infrastructures such as roads, schools or bridges, For example, most areas in India are isolated and remoted where people have been living an impoverished life and poor facilities so it is necessary for people there to reach investment from governments
on the other hand, I support the opinion that nations could be given the diversity of benefits by organising several big sport events. Firstly, it is a great opportunity for poor residents to get jobs. As a result, because many people got a job, the rate of unemployment certainly decreases so the economy of countries would be improved and developed. Secondly, hosting sports events would support for the nation in attracting tourists. The governments would reach an enormous amount of profits from travellers. For example, when the world cup was organised in Qatar, a huge number of tourists travelled and visited this country for travelling and watching the world cup. Moreover, the culture and traditions of the host country would be introduced to the world
.In conclusion, I believe that the benefits of hosting international events would outweigh the drawbacks, although there are several weaknesses in organising these events
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-05 | Nguyễn Tiến Vũ | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | Nguyễn Tiến Vũ | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | Nguyễn Tiến Vũ | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | linhchihwg | 82 | view |
| 2023-04-01 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
- Some people think that it is a waste of money for countries to host big sporting events like the world cup and that the money would be better spent on other things However others think that hosting large sporting events has a clear positive impact on a co 78
- Some people think that it is a waste of money for countries to host big sporting events like the world cup and that the money would be better spent on other things However others think that hosting large sporting events has a clear positive impact on a co 84
- Some people think that it is a waste of money for countries to host big sporting events like the world cup and that the money would be better spent on other things However others think that hosting large sporting events has a clear positive impact on a co 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
it would be argued by some people that: ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 6, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it would be argued by some people that: th...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y terrific impacts on the host nations some people agree that governments would...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e to reach investment from governments on the other hand, I support the opinion...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...untry would be introduced to the world .In conclusion, I believe that the benef...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 5, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...y would be introduced to the world .In conclusion, I believe that the benefi...
^^
Line 4, column 7, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...would be introduced to the world .In conclusion, I believe that the benefits...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1933.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2527173913 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78409304627 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 591.3 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 96.592063166 49.4020404114 196% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.866666667 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5333333333 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2666666667 7.06120827912 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.439300546716 0.244688304435 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152709509842 0.084324248473 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105861141121 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.282349451197 0.151304729494 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0920858123437 0.056905535591 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.