The chart below shows the amount of money given to developing countries from five organisations from 2008 to 2011.
The bar chart illustrates the amount of money being donated to developing nations from five separate organizations between 2008 and 2011.
Overview, organization 2 witnessed a significant increase while those organizations 4 and 5 took the opposite trend. Among these, organization 3 obtaining the highest amount in 2008 and 2009 was surpassed by organization 2 in the following two years.
In 2008, the amount of dollars of organization 3 reached 1,5 million, which was the largest among of funding among all. Slightly below were the figures for organization 2 and 5, at approximately 1,3 million. The amount of money funded by organization 4 gained 0,7 million, which was 0,1 million higher than that of organization 1.
In the following years, the amount of dollars raised by organization 2 reached the peak of over 2,5 million, surpassing organization 3 to become the highest figure of all. In contrast, here were a noticeable downward trend in organization 5, which dropped down to under 0,5 million in 2011. Similar changes but in a lower extent, organization underwent a slight decrease from 0,6 million to 0,3 million in the end of the period. Finally, the amount of dollars given by organisation 3 registered a fluctuation which ended at the same figure in the beginning at 1.5 million and that of organisation 1 similarly fluctuated, hovering around 0,9 to 0,6 million.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, similarly, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1159.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12831858407 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15600892846 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526548672566 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 344.7 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2244392641 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.9 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187631789144 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898970620814 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10823889798 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159984887041 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142632012092 0.0819641961636 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.