The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Whether or not the development of science should be focused on the well-being of human beings is being commonly debated. Some believe that scientists should solely aim for scientific breakthroughs and not be influenced by any other factors other than their field of study. However, this essay would argue that all scientific experiments should prioritize enhancing the quality of the lives of people, and that any science which is detrimental to people should be ceased.
To start with, many people opine that scientists should be encouraged to endeavor in making any scientific progress. If limitations were posed on them, requiring that the achievements in their field must do good to the public, then the researchers’ potential of making significant discoveries would be greatly restricted. Others who also advocate that science does not necessarily need to be aimed at improving lives suggest that any advancements in science would mean a stop further for us mankind. For example, from ancient cold weapons to the atomic bombs nowadays, despite the destructive capabilities of such weapons, they represent a great leap in humans’ military equipments.
Although such statements may seem adequate at first glance, flaws could be easily be found at second glance. Aiming to improve human lives does not limit scientists, it serves as a motivation instead. Nowadays, many scientists in the medical field are experimenting to battle various diseases. During the COVID19 pandemic, especially, top medical institutions worked day and night in the hope of finding a cure and vaccine. They were propelled by the thought of they could save millions of lives which are threatened by the deadly virus. Besides, in spite of the primary deterious effects of nuclear, scientists have optimized its use and is now used in power plants to produce electricity globally. Hence, though some scientific discoveries may have adverse effect on people, the ultimate goal is for scientists to continue experimenting and find a way which exploits their advantageous aspects.
To sum up, the goal of scientific research to improve people’s lives act as a motivation rather than a limiting one, and scientists should always treat this aim with utmost priority.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-14 | trpg143 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 61
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- my interpretation of civilization
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films Why could this be Should the government give more financial support to local film industries 67
- The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Whether or not the development of science shoul...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'Whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: Whether
Whether or not the development of science should be fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, hence, however, if, may, second, so, then, well, for example, in spite of, to start with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1902.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37288135593 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92079467389 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590395480226 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2065754122 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.8 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.06666666667 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262622845224 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860208897118 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.078525187026 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177262305635 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627415458559 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.