The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The presented bar chart illustrates how many billions of minutes of call done in the UK between 1995 and 2002, according to various usages: by mobiles, by fixed line for local contacts and for national and international ones.
In general, fixed-line calls were the most dominant during the 7-year period. By comparison, mobiles for both local, national, and international calls experienced a surprisingly remarkable rise in total usage.
In 1995, with over 70 billion minutes, local dial calls doubled as another type of fixed line before reaching the highest peak at 90 billion minutes in 1999. From 1999 to 2002, it dropped significantly to the data as same as 1995's record. In contrast, the total number of national and international calls continuously climbing up to 60 billion in 2002.
Having the least figure at the beginning (with only 3 billion minutes), the tendency of utilizing mobile phone in the UK became more and more recognizing after 1999 with a tremendous growth up to roughly 45 billion minutes in 2002.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-24 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-24 | LUCIALUSO | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-31 | teulimin.06 | 10 | view |
| 2022-09-06 | Iqreet Kaur | 84 | view |
| 2022-05-31 | vananhxh2005 | view |
- The maps below show the organization of a bookstore in 2000 and now 78
- The diagram illustrates the production of ethanol fuel from corn 84
- In some countries, the average worker is obliged to retire at the age of 50, while in others people can work until they are 65 or 70. It has been claimed that workers over 50 are not responsive to rapidly changing ideas in the modern workplace and that fo 84
- The line graph below shows the production of paper wood pulp and sawn wood in the UK from 1980 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Some people think everyone should be a vegetarian because we do not need to eat meat to have a healthy diet To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 862.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10059171598 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82513242189 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621301775148 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1472444817 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.142857143 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214941900417 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0994488680191 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417641095217 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12661257085 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04278177969 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.