The chart shows the proportion of renewable energy in total energy supply in 4 countries from 1997 to 2010
The given bar graph compares 4 different countries namely Australia, Sweden, Iceland, and Turkey in term of the supplied alternative sources over a period of 13 years starting from 1997.
Overall, it is noticeable that Iceland and Sweden experienced upward trends while the reverse patterns were true for Australia and Turkey. Additionally, the amount of renewable energy produced in Iceland was by far highest in all the surveyed period.
With regard to the rate of the production from regenerated sources in Iceland, after which it steeply grew by 15% to nearly 60% in the next 3 years, then it continued to increase to hold the first rank at 70%. The similar trend, to a smaller extent, could be seen in Sweden, whose figure was lowest at the first year, at under 5%, witnessed a gradual rise to nearly 10% in the final year.
Meanwhile, the figure for the Australian region saw a slight dip of around 3% to hit the bottom at a minority of around 4% in 2010. Starting at nearly 40%, the entire amount of energy in Turkey fluctuated by roughly 5%, but later ended the period at over 30%.
- The diagram shows the design of a modern landfill for household waste Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram shows the design of a modern landfill for household waste Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart shows the proportion of renewable energy in total energy supply in 4 countries from 1997 to 2010 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, then, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.703125 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53208041077 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635416666667 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.779597755 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4285714286 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124550582778 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566830782488 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527732865144 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0763114732672 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401601483876 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.