The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000, and the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar charts give some information about marriage and divorce rate in the United Stated between 1970 and 2000, and marital status of adult Americans in 1970 and 2000.
In general, the marriage rate was higher than divorce rate in the United Stated from 1970 to 2000 and the percentage of married status was about 70% in 1970.
As can be seen, there was a slight decrease rate approximately 0.5 millions in marriage rate, while although after 1970 divorces rate has a 0.3 millions increase, it dropped again in 1990 and return to first place of 1 millions in the United Stated from 1970 to 2000. The percentage of marital status include four different types which married has maximum percent and in 1970 a little more. After it the people who never married located at the second place and the rate was more in 2000 and other remain groups were no longer significant with under 5 percent.
As a result, the rate of marriages has reduced and marital status of adult in married has maximum rate.
- the pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010
- The chart below show how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 61
- The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, while, in general, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 823.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67613636364 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28755814405 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522727272727 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.9211474792 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.166666667 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3333333333 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316119684799 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190614119486 0.103423049105 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147412736568 0.0843802449381 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25784734414 0.15604864568 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138302197699 0.0819641961636 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.46 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.