Professor: Funding for education is a really hot topic nowadays, so today we’re going to talk about how universities use their limited resources. In the discussion board please respond to the following question: Should universities prioritize funding academic facilities like libraries, or is it okay to spend just as much money on sports and athletic programs?
Rachel: I think universities should prioritize funding for libraries. Libraries are essential for academic research, and they provide students with access to information and resources that they might not have otherwise. Investing in libraries can also help attract and retain the most talented professors, which can ultimately benefit the university as a whole. Sports, on the other hand, appeal to just a few people.
Mike: While I agree that libraries are important, I think that sports programs should also be a priority for universities. Sports can bring the campus community together, even if that just means they attend sports and cheer for their favorite athletes. Meanwhile, among the athletes themselves, sports promote teamwork and leadership skills. Additionally, successful sports programs can generate revenue for the university and boost its reputation.
In my opinion, universities should mostly prioritize funding academic facilities, such as libraries. I strongly agree with Rachel's opinion that libraries are essential for academic activities in general. I would also add that by funding libraries and other academic facilities, including laboratories, universities will attract not only talent professors, but also talented students. This process would increase the universities reputation even more and in turn it will get even more funds from various resources such as from national institutes, scientific communities, and even from big business corporations.
Mike raised a relevant point that by funding sports, universities reputation will also increase. But he missed the point that sport driven universities and its reputation is not long lasting. This act will usually attract sport oriented students, who are not good at academic activities because such students mostly spent their time around focusing on their sports achievements, not academic progresses. Hence, it would lead bad consequences for universities in the long run.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-28 | TANVIR SIDDIKE MOIN | 60 | view |
| 2023-12-11 | Apolytos | 80 | view |
- Recently, there has a debate about the approaches that might be used to stop the increasing in cane toad population in Australia, the author in the reading passage comes up with three approaches to solve this problem, while, the professor in the lecture c 71
- Professor Today we re discussing the ethics of targeted advertising Some people argue that online advertising which uses personal information to target specific people is an invasion of privacy Others argue that it s simply an acceptable way to reach cons 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 78
- TPO 22 Ethanol Fuel 80
- TPO 19 Many consumers ignore commercial advertisements In response advertising companies have started using a new tactic called buzzing The advertisers hire people buzzers who personally promote buzz products to people they know or meet The key part is th 70
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 5
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 9
No. of Words: 160 150
No. of Characters: 910 900
No. of Different Words: 98 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.557 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.688 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.944 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 70 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 60 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 47 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 29 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.155 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.875 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.437 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.437 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.128 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 1