Essay topics:
the graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
The line chart describes the popularity of four different types of food consumed in European countries between 1979 and 2004. Overall, the trend of food consumption wasn't uniform. The chicken consumers increased dramatically, while beef, lamb and fish fell steadily.
Firstly, in 1979 the lowest consumption was chicken and fish . The chicken started approximately 150 grams per person per week. However, after 1984 the consumption of the chicken rose gradually and then increased significantly and finally ended at 250 grams per person per week in 2004. Whereas, the fish ...
Votes
Essay Categories
Essays by user gollu
:
- In many countries children are engaged in some kind of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it as valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility.What are your opinions on this? (IELTS BO 85
- ( re write) Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 80
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.To what extent do you agree or disagree? ( ielts book 6 test2) 80
- The chart below gives information on the age of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projection for 2050.( ielts book 9 test 3) 70
- Some people believe that there should be fixed punishment for each type of crime however, others argue that the circumstances of an individual crime and the motivation for committing it should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment 85
Sentence: However, in the year 1979 and 2004 the trend of the chicken, beef and lamb were fluctuating wildly.
Description: The fragment fluctuating wildly . is not usually preceded by were
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace were with was
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 11 9
No. of Words: 214 200
No. of Characters: 1061 900
No. of Different Words: 91 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.825 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.958 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.634 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 72 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 62 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 35 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 26 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.455 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.56 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.818 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.469 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.686 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.213 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4