The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features of the graph and make comparisons where relevant
The given picture illustrates how rainwater is captured for the purpose of drinking in several households.
Overview, the process consists of five key stages in the process of harvesting water for drinking, beginning with capturing water when it rains and ending with clean water available in people’s house.
Firstly, the process commences when the water is captured on the roof and into gutters, where it then runs down into the drainage pipes attached to the side of the house. All the drainage pipes are set up to bring water to a system that is used to eliminate contaminated substances from water, which is then sent to a place where to store water for long-term use.
From the storage tanks, the water is transferred to a treatment tank where chemicals are added to it. The water is then ready to be delivered via pipes that flow from the treatment tanks to the taps inside people’s homes
- In many countries children are becoming overweight and unhealthy Some people think that this is the responsibility of governments to solve the problem To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Some feel that individuals should have the right to strike in all jobs while others feel there are exceptions Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport You should write at least 150 words 73
- It is important for everyone including young people to save money for their future To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne Australia for the period 2000 to 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons w 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 750.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83870967742 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56020940871 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567741935484 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0111773382 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8333333333 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168537976298 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0873811637398 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470948032437 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104475902035 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368181647356 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.