Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents.
Children are often born with special talents, ranging from academic abilities in subjects like physics to artistic skills such as identifying musical notes. Although these children possess innate talent, it requires significant nurturing and development to realize their full potential. Therefore, society should indeed identify children with special talents and provide training for them at an early age to foster their development.
Identifying early signs of special talent can be challenging and requires extensive research and analysis. Once effective identification metrics are established, they would be immensely beneficial for both children and their parents. Recognizing these talents early on allows for tailored training and education that can help children excel in their areas of strength.
Children from affluent families often have more opportunities to develop their talents due to better access to resources. These children can pursue their interests without financial constraints, allowing them to stand out and potentially turn their talents into successful careers. Conversely, talented children from less privileged backgrounds face significant barriers. Financial burdens often prevent these children from recognizing or developing their talents, as they may be forced to prioritize immediate economic needs over long-term personal growth. As a result, many potential prodigies remain undiscovered and unfulfilled.
"Talent is like food; it doesn't have a long shelf life." This analogy underscores the importance of early identification and nurturing of talent. Studies have shown that children have a greater capacity to develop and refine their skills during their formative years. Thus, it is crucial to provide specialized training and resources to talented children as early as possible to maximize their potential.
Talent search programs and awareness campaigns can play a vital role in this process. These initiatives would educate both parents and children about the importance of identifying and nurturing special talents. By encouraging children to participate in various activities and events, these programs can help uncover hidden talents. For example, a potential chess prodigy might never discover their aptitude for the game without being introduced to it through a structured program.
In conclusion, society has a responsibility to identify and nurture the special talents of children. By providing early training and support, we can ensure that these children have the opportunity to develop their skills and achieve their full potential. This approach not only benefits the individual children but also contributes to the overall progress and enrichment of society. Therefore, implementing programs to identify and train talented children is a worthwhile investment in our collective future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-24 | batterylow_123 | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-31 | josow | 66 | view |
| 2024-07-27 | qsdzlbnwtpzecdeugi | 70 | view |
| 2024-07-27 | qsdzlbnwtpzecdeugi | 62 | view |
| 2024-04-18 | guozhishan | 58 | view |
- In order for any work of art for example a film a novel a poem or a song to have merit it must be understandable to most people 58
- Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents 70
- Essay 3 Although innovations such as video computers and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students these technologies all too often distract from real learning 33
- Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents 62
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2451.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 410.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.97804878049 5.05705443957 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95286086186 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553658536585 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 747.9 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.0406944722 60.3974514979 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 111.409090909 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6363636364 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90909090909 5.21951772744 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 10.2758426966 195% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.51280863512 0.243740707755 210% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163220865096 0.0831039109588 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131997828404 0.0758088955206 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.299293087023 0.150359130593 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108617562999 0.0667264976115 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 14.1392134831 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 48.8420337079 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.4 12.1639044944 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.38706741573 120% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 100.480337079 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.