The bar chart shows the percentage of males and females aged 18-20 in a city who participated in various activities in one month in 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar chart provides information about the proportion of females and males aged in the 18-20 age bracket engaging in different outdoor activities in a month in 2015
Overall, hockey was the least popular sport in both genders. In addition, women had the highest share in cycling and swimming, while the highest figures for men were reported in basketball, football, and hockey.
There was a significant difference between the proportions of males and females in football, with the former standing first with 51%, threefold to that of the latter. The disparity between the two figures was almost the same in basketball and hockey. In the former, men accounted for around 33%, threefold to that of women. Meanwhile, in that latter, the figure for males made up roughly 11%, twofold to that of their counterparts.
With regard to the remaining sports, the rate of women taking part in cycling was higher than men with 40%, compared to only around 36% of men. Additionally, in swimming, the contribution of females taking part in swimming reached 36%, which was nearly two times as high as that of males.
- All students should be required to study art and music in secondary school Do you agree or disagree with the following statement 74
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 56
- The graph below shows the average time spent by four car manufacturers to produce vehicles at their US factories 67
- The line chart below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000 78
- Bullying is a big problem in many schools What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, while, in addition, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 926.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97849462366 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64520500008 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569892473118 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1454502004 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.75 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125623794317 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049647460145 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0856555113493 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101929473435 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135883334198 0.0819641961636 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.