Some people think that art ( such as painting and music) does not directly improve quality of people’s life, so government should spend money on other areas. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
While certain artistic expressions, particularly Hollywood films, generate significant financial returns for governmental coffers, many other art terms, such as painting and music does not directly improve quality of people’s life. From my perspective, this argument the arts can be justified from certain angles but it’s potential coexist if government focus too much on entertainment. Admittedly, there are some arguments in favor of painting give some important parts in life. First, government subsidies for higher rating are believed to equalize working opportunities among young adolescents regardless of their family background. This financial support, presumably tends not only to increase the overall art skill rate of lower-income people but also to mitigate their feeling of inferiority, which promotes an egalitarian society. Second, spend money for art ( such as painting or music) would probably result in a greater supply of highly qualified workers. Example, the famous arts in over decades is Mona Lisa, creating the mystery of art and attracting many countries being auctioned for many years, which benefits society in the long run. In fact, it is acknowledged that skill as knowledgeable human capital is imperative to foster economic growth and technological development in any nations.
Nevertheless, the resultant problems would be far more significant than the minor benefits once if government spend too much money and art does not improve qualified of people’s life. First, support on art would likely correspond with a tremendous financial strain on a country. Generating no income from normal arts and profits of art events, company can become over-reliant on the state budget for funding, meaning that there would be less input to develop other important areas such as healthcare systems and transport infrastructure. Second, government spend money for art would tempt many young people including those who are not painting inclined or show no interest artistic development, thereby adding great burdens for government and enrollment staff and wasting time that these young people could spent time for suitable career paths. It, instead, would be a more financial viable option if the resources were focus on art lover.
In conclusion, cannot be denied that the effect of art for people’s life. However, government should consider for other benefit areas when art just benefits for only individual who creates it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-18 | Trần Ánh Vy | 89 | view |
| 2024-09-18 | Trần Ánh Vy | 56 | view |
- The best way to teach children to cooperate is through team sports at school To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The diagram below shows the recycling process of plastics Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below gives information about different types of in one country in 1960 and 2011 67
- The diagram below shows how a modern landfill for household waste is designed Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The bar chart show the number of visit to community website in first year and second years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features have relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 866, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ian society. Second, spend money for art such as painting or music would probably...
^^
Line 2, column 807, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires base form of the verb: 'spend'.
Suggestion: spend
...ting time that these young people could spent time for suitable career paths. It, ins...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, while, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2075.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 374.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54812834225 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87854684068 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593582887701 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 633.6 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.6441197807 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.333333333 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9333333333 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292609453744 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101916791426 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788927942073 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210123049779 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032553424481 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.