Every day, millions of tons of food are wasted all over the world. Why do you think this is happening? And how can we solve this problem?
Nowadays, there is a growing trend towards people are food obsolete but not found solve problem. This essay will prove this correlation demonstrating and analyzing the resultant lack of food and the potential rise in no food rate, after first examining some underlying causes of the growing trend.
The negligibly low level of people attendance in how to save food be ascribed to a number of reasons. Firstly,in order to save recycling food which often are presumably can do it. In fact, there is a plenty of scientific evidence proving that only a rather people not waste food of the human population, meaning that almost people wasted food because they eat too full or this food not delicious so people often obsolete. Meanwhile, all over the world still have many poor people don’t have food. Secondly, in many countries, like Africa extremely short of food or drink even have to eat food made from mud. However, have many people wasting meat now just only reasons they don’t like eat. This perfectly explains the growing meat obsolete of the world to more developed nations beacause everyone unreasonably waste food without thinking about others or the consequences of future food shortages.
In the long run, waste meat would brin several social problem. So, we need solve this big problem before the bigger consequences happen. In other words, when we wasting food why we don’t recycle food or reheat it while it still eating or become volunteers give food or drink for poor people. In addition, we don’t need food but other people need,if we wasting food then food are limited, greater numbers people in the world may face lack of food. Consequently, governments just need supporting food for everyone, which adds to the annual budget deficit.
In conclusion, due to the food demands and development world more by more. So, food is becoming more and more expensive. Although this may lead to many serious social issues, some practical measures based on financial incentives such as recycling food or volunteers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-17 | nguyenkhangtriem | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-17 | nguyenkhangtriem | 56 | view |
| 2022-12-26 | mytinh | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-28 | gianggiangvn | 84 | view |
| 2022-11-21 | giangngoc | 82 | view |
- The pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 67
- Some people think that unpaid community services should be a compulsory part of high school programs example charity improving the neighborhood or teaching sports for young children 84
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Nowadays more people move away from their friends and families for work Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some people think that young people should be required to do unpaid work helping people in the community Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 109, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...ascribed to a number of reasons. Firstly,in order to save recycling food which ofte...
^^^
Line 2, column 248, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('rather') instead an adjective, or a noun ('people') instead of another adjective.
...f scientific evidence proving that only a rather people not waste food of the human population,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 345, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , if
...we don’t need food but other people need,if we wasting food then food are limited, ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, then, while, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1693.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0237388724 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53403428633 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566765578635 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9282640073 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5882352941 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8235294118 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.11764705882 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310464861041 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105297811294 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562378619436 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184853679063 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579892739243 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.