In the modern world, we still value artists such as painters, writers and musicians.
What can arts tell us about life what science cannot?
In today’s world, artists in different disciplines such as music, literature and painting are still highly valued. This is because the way arts interpret the physical world is so relatable to normal people that science might not be comparable with.
Apparently, scientific advancements enable humans to qualify and quantify physical materials accurately, allowing us to determine which material is suitable for a specific purpose. Such feat is achieved through the use of different logical processes such as observation, note-taking, hypothesizing and finally assessing. Therefore, scientific explanations of a phenomenon often involve complex charts, calculations and technical jargons which are not readily decipherable to the general public, rendering sciences generally popular among people with a scientific background. In contrast, those preferring explanations in layman’s terms tend to opt for less “arcane” sources.
For the aforementioned reason, artists play a vital role in providing a more straightforward and captivating perspectives on life issues. For example, through a means of painting, Van Gogh has provided common viewers a profound insight, open to interpretation, into the world of human psyche and their sufferings in a vivid manner that hardly could any psychology research match. Moreover, in terms of prediction, many fiction novels, such as twenty thousand leagues under seas, have suggested new avenues for scientific studies in a mesmerizing way like a movie that also detailed struggles in a science adventure. It is also of note that music can concisely inform us of a community’s ethos, their thinking and their beliefs in a few minutes while it must take much longer for a science presentation to do so.
In conclusion, although sciences help humans gain an in-depth understanding of the natural world, it is arts that helps us express ourself in understandable and colorful ways that are often devoid in science papers. However, I argue that there is a mutual relationship between arts and science that should be maintained to help us obtain the possibly deepest view of the world.
- Only government action can solve housing shortages in big cities to what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- As the number of cars increases more money has to be spent on road system Some people think that the government should pay for this Others however think that the users should pay for the cost Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Today people are wasting large amounts of food Why What can be done to reduce the amount of food wasted 95
- Many of the products we buy nowadays break or wear out very quickly What are the advantages and disadvantages of this for manufacturers and the public 89
- Keeping animals in the zoo is the best way to protect wild animals Do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 18, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In today’s world, artists in different disciplines such as...
^^
Line 4, column 480, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ich are not readily decipherable to the general public, rendering sciences generally popular a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 226, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...ften devoid in science papers. However, I argue that there is a mutual relationsh...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, finally, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1816.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57055214724 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18230504147 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644171779141 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.2433723685 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.333333333 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1666666667 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5833333333 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175930722984 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626136029838 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426641265636 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110359509465 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448858003285 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.64 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.