The graph below gives information about computer possession by households in one European country between 1997 and 2011

Essay topics:

The graph below gives information about computer possession by households in one European country between 1997 and 2011.

The graph illustrates the trend in computer ownership among households in a European country from 1997 to 2011.

From the data, it is clear that computer possession increased significantly over this 14-year period. In 1997, the percentage of households with a computer was relatively low, at just below 30%. However, there was a steady rise in ownership throughout the following years, with a marked increase after 2001. By 2005, over 50% of households owned a computer. this upward trend continued sharply, reaching nearly 80% by 2011, indicating that the majority of households had access to a computer by the end of the period.

The graph shows that the rate of increase was especially rapid in the first half of the 2000s, likely due to technological advances and reduced costs of computers, making them more accessible to the general public. The growth in ownership then began to slow down slightly in the latter years, though it still maintained a steady upward trajectory.

In conclusion, the graph demonstrates a clear and continuous rise in computer ownership among households in this country, reflecting the growing role of technology in everyday life.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-11-29 Nguyen Thinh 84 view
2024-08-22 Tuan Harry 67 view
Essays by user Nguyen Thinh :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 359, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ver 50% of households owned a computer. this upward trend continued sharply, reachin...
^^^^
Line 5, column 200, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ers, making them more accessible to the general public. The growth in ownership then began to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, still, then, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 988.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25531914894 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88480353648 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579787234043 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1320708092 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.777777778 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242605058004 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104965973201 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109913160165 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169912976236 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129740107066 0.0819641961636 158% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.