The chart below gives information about European of different age groups who went to gyms once a month or more between 1990 and 2010. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph below show the people in European of different age group went to gym from 1990 to 2010.
Overall, the percentage of people went to gym in 1990 was lowest. Meanwhile, in 1994 to 2006 all increased. However, we can see clearly if we look at the specific decline.
Look at the line graph in 1990 to 2002. It can be seen that, the percentage of people went to gym in 1990 all lowest ( 0-10%). However, in 1994 the rates of people went to gym of 25-34 years old was highest (20%) also the age of 18-24 had the same rate (20%). Meanwhile, the rates people of 25-44 and 45 over just had 10%. In 1998, the rate in 25-44 and 45 over didn’t changed but 15-24 and 25-34 age group had same percentage and has significantly increased when from 20% to 30%.
Look at the line graph from 2002 to 2010. The percentage people of 25-44 and 45 over were lowest (10% and 20%) but the age of 25-44 increased more than in 1998. Meanwhile, the rate people of 18-24 and 24-34 age group ( 35% and 40%). However, in last year 2010. All age group had significantly increased, the age group of 25-44 from 20% to 49% but 45 over was still 10%. Finally, the percentage people of 18-24 and 25-34 (60% and 50%). So, it can be seen that gym tempt older people than younger people in the past.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-10 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
- The table below shows the percentage of households with computers and Internet access in three different countries from 2005 to 2015 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram show the space journey of Soyuz rocket Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Children should do organized activities in their free time while others believe children should be free to do what they want Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- Around the world some adults work from home as technology becomes cheaperand more accessible Technology is an important part of modern life From my perspective both happenings are and I will explain more in this essay 56
- The advantages brought the spread of English as a global language will outweigh the disadvantages Tow what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
The line graph below show the people in European of di...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of people went to gym in 1990 all lowest 0-10%. However, in 1994 the rates of peo...
^^
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'didn't' requires base form of this verb: 'change'.
Suggestion: change
...8, the rate in 25-44 and 45 over didn’t changed but 15-24 and 25-34 age group had same ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 215, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rate people of 18-24 and 24-34 age group 35% and 40%. However, in last year 2010....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, look, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1024.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 243.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.21399176955 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.14881814757 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.390946502058 0.547539520022 71% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.2353138733 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 64.0 112.824112599 57% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 15.1875 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4375 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128322866715 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577345868864 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685769978041 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128673752685 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0946232960837 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.0 13.2329268293 45% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 98.55 61.2550243902 161% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 3.2 10.3012195122 31% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 6.55 11.4140731707 57% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 5.68 8.06136585366 70% => OK
difficult_words: 20.0 40.7170731707 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 6.0 11.0658536585 54% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.