The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and ma

Essay topics:

The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given pie chart and table provides the causes of low productivity of agricultural land and it's affect in North America, Europe and Oceania during the 1990s.

Overall, it is seen that over-grazing was the major cause of land degradation by which Oceania was affected the most. However, maximum land degradation was observed in Europe.

During the 1990s, over-grazing was the prime factor at 35% for deteriorating land. This was followed by deforestation and over-cultivation at 30% and 28% respectively. Also, other minimal causes contributed 7% to land damage.

In Europe, 9.8% of damage to land was caused by cutting trees and 7.7% due to over-cultivation. Hence making it the most degraded land. The second most was Oceania, with over-grazing at 11.3% as the major concern. Also, here over-cultivation played no part in harming land. While, in North America it caused mere 3.3% with the lowest land degraded at 5 %.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-24 Noah1997 78 view
2020-01-19 mone49 56 view
2020-01-07 Yee Mon 84 view
2020-01-07 Miss Zune 84 view
2020-01-02 ssb 56 view
Essays by user sukriti04 :

Comments

The given pie chart and table provides the causes
The given pie chart and table provide the causes

and it's affect in North America
and its effects in North America

flaws:
No. of Words: 149 200

Minimum 150 words wanted.

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 11 10
No. of Words: 149 200
No. of Characters: 740 1000
No. of Different Words: 86 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.5 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.933 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.102 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 49 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 32 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 20 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 14 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 13.636 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.677 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.545 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.41 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.618 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.08 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4