In any situation progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In devel

Any situation in life can have different interpretations depending upon the way of perception of its observer. An optimist may say that the glass is half full while a pessimist would say that it is half empty. Human mind is a complex computer whose interpretation of a particular event or situation may depend upon several complex factors like past experiances, present environment, an individual's ideals and many other yet unthought of factors. Thus in any situation, individuals may and do have contrasting views depending the way they interpret the situation. As a result, starting from a situation or problem there maybe several approaches to arrive at the possible solution depending upon the mindset of the solution provider. However, to arrive at the best possible solution, contrasting opinions will have to be examined. Therefore, In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.

Each individual,depending upon his past experiances, his standing in life, his ideals and his requirements has a particular interpretation of any situation or problem. Different individuals perceive different aspects of a situation as well as those of its probable solutions. For example, the elected chair person or mayor of a city may have a desire of building a bridge or flyover at a particular place in the city to decrease traffic jams. In his own mind building the flyover may be the most elegant solution fully worthy of the taxpayer's money that will be spent on it. However,on closer examination analysts may find that the cost incurred in building the bridge or flyover will not be offset by the decrease in traffic problems. The flyover may not have the predicted effect and the taxpayer's money which could have gone in health or education will be ill-spent on a potentially redundant structure. In this situation the mayor should listen and closely examine the contrasting views. He should analyse if the contrasting opinions are the ones which are more likely to be correct. Only then a proper decision will be made. By examining such opposing views he may be able to arrive at better solutions to solve the traffic problem.

In the modern world,the democratic system is considered to be the most humane system of governance. Such a system generally gives a two party or multi-party rule. Each such party represents a particular school of thought, a vision of ruling and administration, a method solving nation's problems and so on. All important decisions need an approval of majority of the parliament which compirses both the ruling party as well as opposition.The major reason behind including the opposition party is that they can adopt a view which can be different and at odds with the ruling party without the fear of being regarded as traitors within the party. They can present contratsing arguments to any important decision made by the ruling party. As a result ruling party will be forced to consider the ways in which any decision will affect different classes of the people.SO there will be decreased possibility of the ruling elite overlooking an important aspect of any major national decision.

Summing up,it is clear that in progressing with any situation,heed must be paid to both supporting and contrasting views on any path of progress. Only then all the aspects of the situation can be considered and the situation can be understood in its entirity. Thus in any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.