The advantages and disadvantages of using Facebook as a means of online instruction
Nowadays, Facebook is one of the most popular social networking sites all over the world. Many people use this sites for a variety of purposes including online teaching. Using Facebook as a means of online instruction has both benefits and drawbacks.
Teachers use Facebook as a means of online instruction because it brings many benefits. First of all, it is very convenient for teachers to use this site. They can post the assignments on Facebook group and their students who are the members of this group can receive and do the tasks immediately. After finishing the assignment, students can post them on this site and teachers can give feedback by commenting on the posts. Secondly, this is the effective way for students to learn from each other. For instance, learners can post their essays on Facebook group so that everyone in group can comment their mistakes. Thus, they can easy to recognize and correct their errors. Finally, instead of spending time going to school, both teachers and students can work effectively by online teaching and learning. This is the good way to save time and they also can spend time reading books, cooking or do other useful things,
On the other hand, using Facebook as a tool of online instruction has some negative aspects. The first drawback is that many students can neglect their learning easily. In reality, some teachers give them a lot of assignments but they do not explain how to do this tasks clearly. This makes students become bored when doing their duty. Moreover, while they are studying, they can use Facebook for different purposes like watching films, listening to music and so on. This has a negative effect on their learning. The next drawback is that Facebook is more ineffective than Zoom or Meet. Facebook only allows students to submit their assignment and receive feedback from their teachers without communicating directly while Zoom or Meet can help them interact with their teachers through video call. Therefore, it is convenient and useful for speaking skill.
In conclusion, Facebook is more and more popular in the world and many people use it for a variety of purposes consisting online teaching. We can use it as a means of online instruction because of its benefits. However, using Facebook has many negative effects above.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1923.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0078125 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57029930763 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.458333333333 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.2727839094 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.6086956522 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6956521739 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78260869565 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262722966976 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108848634995 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138288617737 0.0667982634062 207% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245691716806 0.151304729494 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104453866613 0.056905535591 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.67 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.