NetworkingChevening is looking for individuals with strong professional relationship-building skills, who will engage with the Chevening community and influence and lead others in their chosen profession. Please explain how you build and maintain relation

Essay topics:

Networking

Chevening is looking for individuals with strong professional relationship-building skills, who will engage with the Chevening community and influence and lead others in their chosen profession. Please explain how you build and maintain relationships in a professional capacity, using clear examples of how you currently do this, and outline how you hope to use these skills in the future. (minimum word count: 100 words; maximum word count: 500 words)

After obtaining a BSc in chemistry/zoology and a diploma in biochemistry and physiology, I started my career as a laboratory technician at Integrated Diagnostics Holdings (IDH). It was a brand experience for me to deal with doctors, professors, and my great experienced colleagues with some of them having more than 10 years of experience, and the latest devices and techniques in the field. All of this was just like a dream come true. I said to myself “you better earn yourself a good place among those very skilled persons”. After only one year I became a senior laboratory technician responsible for routine testing, stat testing, training the newcomers, and even warehouse stock monitoring and purchasing. I kept moving up in my career in IDH till I reached the head of department of corrective actions and assessment, alongside my core role as a laboratory technician. All of this continuously introduced me to new people with different career pathways and responsibilities, and each one of them has learned me something new and affected my mind, views, and my life.

When I joined the 6th Cycle of the International Medical Laboratory Scientist (IMLS) training program offered by the Engineering & Science Services (ESS) at the American University in Cairo (AUC), I was excited to find out that the practical curriculum was held at IDH. I used my ongoing relations with my previous coworkers to assure that my new colleagues at the AUC are getting the best possible experience and knowledge from my old coworkers.

Despite all of this, some aspects of knowledge and particular experiences were not available at IDH, so I once again contacted some old fellows working at the Children's Cancer Hospital Egypt (CCHE 57357), widely known as 57357 hospital. I asked if they could host the practical part of the training program at their laboratories, and now there are meetings between the administrations of both the AUC and 57357 hospital regarding Initial agreement on cooperation. Of course the students of the 7th Cycle of the International Medical Laboratory Scientist (IMLS) training program and the ones after will benefit of this cooperation, but I feel satisfied that my actions could pave the way for them.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-10-20 mh_hamama 11 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user mh_hamama :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, so, i feel, of course

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 24.0651302605 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1857.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11570247934 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14937630757 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592286501377 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.3630281561 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.75 106.682146367 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.25 20.7667163134 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.41666666667 7.06120827912 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0560972160547 0.244688304435 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0214703115366 0.084324248473 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0251653712589 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0373572598186 0.151304729494 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0131133643852 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.01 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 0.67 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.