NetworkingChevening is looking for individuals with strong professional relationship-building skills, who will engage with the Chevening community and influence and lead others in their chosen profession. Please explain how you build and maintain relation

Essay topics:

Networking

Chevening is looking for individuals with strong professional relationship-building skills, who will engage with the Chevening community and influence and lead others in their chosen profession. Please explain how you build and maintain relationships in a professional capacity, using clear examples of how you currently do this, and outline how you hope to use these skills in the future. (minimum word count: 100 words; maximum word count: 500 words)

After obtaining a BSc in chemistry/zoology and a diploma in biochemistry and physiology, I started my career as a laboratory technician at Integrated Diagnostics Holdings (IDH). It was a brand new experience for me to deal with doctors, professors, and my great experienced colleagues with some of them having more than 10 years of experience, and the latest devices and techniques in the field. All of this was just like a dream come true. I said to myself “you better earn yourself a good place among those very skilled persons”. After only one year I became a senior laboratory technician responsible for routine testing, stat testing, training the newcomers, and even warehouse stock monitoring and purchasing. I kept moving up in my career in IDH till I reached the head of department of corrective actions and assessment, alongside my core role as a laboratory technician. All of this continuously introduced me to new people with different career pathways and responsibilities, and each one of them has learned me something new and affected my mind, views, and my life.

When I joined the 6th Cycle of the International Medical Laboratory Scientist (IMLS) training program offered by the Engineering & Science Services (ESS) at the American University in Cairo (AUC), I was excited to find out that the practical curriculum was held at IDH. I used my ongoing relations with my previous coworkers to assure that my new colleagues at the AUC are getting the best possible experience and knowledge from my old coworkers.

Despite all of this, some aspects of knowledge and particular experiences were not available at IDH, so I once again contacted some old fellows working at the Children's Cancer Hospital Egypt (CCHE 57357), widely known as 57357 hospital. I asked if they could host the practical part of the training program at their laboratories, and now there are meetings between the administrations of both the AUC and 57357 hospital regarding Initial agreement on cooperation. Of course the students of the 7th Cycle of the International Medical Laboratory Scientist (IMLS) training program and the ones after will benefit of this cooperation, but I feel satisfied that my actions could pave the way for them.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-10-20 mh_hamama 11 view
2019-10-20 mh_hamama 11 view
2019-10-20 mh_hamama 77 view
2019-10-20 mh_hamama 77 view
2019-10-20 mh_hamama 11 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user mh_hamama :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, so, i feel, of course

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 8.36945812808 215% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 20.9802955665 200% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 31.9359605911 166% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1860.0 1207.87684729 154% => OK
No of words: 364.0 242.827586207 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10989010989 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 3.92707691288 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1469471575 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 139.433497537 154% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590659340659 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 379.143842365 154% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.931034482759 752% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 20.5024630542 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.5412366532 50.4703680194 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.0 104.977214359 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3333333333 20.9669160288 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.41666666667 7.25397266985 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.12807881773 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0557726470051 0.242375264174 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0213310513955 0.0925447433944 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0247997310631 0.071462118173 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0371392905798 0.151781067708 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.012809089794 0.0609392437508 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 12.6369458128 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 55.0591133005 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.3980295567 135% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.