In order to solve traffic problems, the government should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a solution? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or
knowledge
As everyone knows, traffic problems present most of every country in the world. To solve these issues, the government taxed private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation. In my viewpoint, this brings both advantages and disadvantages.
On the one hand, the method is a cause to overload vehicles on the road. Having too many vehicles run in the path especially in peak hours, results in traffic in a long time and people feel so tired and annoyed. By means of using public transportation, problems can be improved. Public transportation is so environmentally friendly and saves fuel. By the way, smoke emits from cars, motorbikes would be less, so air and noise pollution also decrease dramatically. This is a positive way via make use of tax private car owners for improving public transportation. The car owner is taxed heavily private tax which helps enhance perception and deed in engaging in transportation. People can drive carefully and slowly and there is less accident occurs.
On the other hand, out of the pros of these ways, it takes some drawbacks. It is one of the reasons leading to the anger of many people. They feel that they are being controlled by the government and endure too high costs from their car tax while they might need not to withstand this. This method is also a cause of illegal actions such as taking fees too much than regular regulation from officials.
To sum up, for the above-mentioned reasons, it is my firm conviction that solving traffic problems by taxing private car owners heavily and using the money to improve public transportation which leads to both the benefits and drawbacks. Government should consider an issue exactly and carefully to have appropriate ways.
- Some people only want to do things that they can do well whereas other want to explore new things that they are not used to even when it mens taking chances What is your preference when working 56
- People have divided opinions on using computers Some say that computers have made their easy But others speak of the complication that computers have brought into their lives Which of these two opinions do you agree with 61
- What is needed in order to become successful talents one in born with or a desire to work hard Which of these two views do you prefer 71
- There is a big number of people who wish to live in big cities Write an essay to an educated reader to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of living in big cities Include reasons and any relevant examples to support your answer 56
- Some people want to meet each other in person to communicate while others want to telephone instead of face to face communication Which of these communication methods do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 39, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... On the other hand, out of the pros of this ways, it takes some drawbacks. It is on...
^^^^
Line 5, column 267, Rule ID: NEEDNT_TO_DO_AND_DONT_NEED_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'withstand'?
Suggestion: withstand
...their car tax while they might need not to withstand this. This method is also a cause of il...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, while, such as, by the way, in my view, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03092783505 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95028339797 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560137457045 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.0936856621 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.1176470588 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1176470588 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.58823529412 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335806429377 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0992761622602 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116909398951 0.0667982634062 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226230473806 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10707060724 0.056905535591 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.67 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 39, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... On the other hand, out of the pros of this ways, it takes some drawbacks. It is on...
^^^^
Line 5, column 267, Rule ID: NEEDNT_TO_DO_AND_DONT_NEED_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'withstand'?
Suggestion: withstand
...their car tax while they might need not to withstand this. This method is also a cause of il...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, while, such as, by the way, in my view, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03092783505 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95028339797 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560137457045 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.0936856621 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.1176470588 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1176470588 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.58823529412 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335806429377 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0992761622602 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116909398951 0.0667982634062 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226230473806 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10707060724 0.056905535591 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.67 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.