Recently, the phenomenon of the compulsory voting and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the country's problems is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that a democratic society can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From social standpoint, having a vote can provide the society with some noticeable effect which are rooted in the fact that merits of social responsibility, as well as mandatory voting, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the role of countries. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both mandatory duties and compulsory duties apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of society, optional voting might increase the consequences of the welfare of country. Moreover, fundamental essence of paying tax could be related to this reality that the demerits of developing countries pertain to developing societies. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of optional voting is correlated negatively with having a vote. Hence it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the society's problems.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I am profoundly believe that the benefits of compulsory voting far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of a democratic world prove the significance of mandatory voting enhanced by social responsibilities, but also pinpoint social behavior implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 435, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...rrelated negatively with having a vote. Hence it is correct to presume the preconceiv...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 90, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'believed'.
Suggestion: believed
...rguments on both sides, I am profoundly believe that the benefits of compulsory voting ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56439393939 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30606746312 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.621212121212 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6293373753 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.416666667 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276192887536 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849272549496 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056007277915 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149691453256 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242933565959 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.65 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.67 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.