The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently the phenomenon of learning a second language and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of learning more than one language is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that being bilingual can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, learning another language can provide a society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that getting familiar with other cultures as well as being more intelligent, are inextricably bound up. According to my personal experiment, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered people who learn to speak in more than one language are smarter than before. Thus, the beneficial consequences of being multilingual and more genius apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of culture, avoid speaking a foreign language might increase the consequences of isolation and biased. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of speaking a local language related to this reality that the demerits of conversation pertain to the low level of education. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of not being bilingual is correlated negatively with biased personality and education. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of being multilingual means people are open to positive changes.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of being bilingual or multilingual far outweigh its drawback. Not only do the advantages of knowledge acquisition of different cultures prove the significance of knowing foreign language, but also pinpoint less prejudice conducts' implication.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-26 | msgnaneswaran | 11 | view |
| 2019-04-06 | mohab.elhaddad | 85 | view |
| 2019-04-02 | foadihasan | 77 | view |
| 2019-04-01 | Fernanda Giorge | 55 | view |
| 2019-02-17 | Mahdi_Farhani | 80 | view |
- the animals have no place in the 21century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. to what extent do you agree or disagree. 67
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping, etc. and whether you support them or not. 77
- Parents are responsible for the behaviour of the children. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 88
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping, etc. and whether you support them or not. 85
- Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss pros and cons impacts. 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, second, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.5418719212 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58020477816 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15298148884 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610921501706 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9672720493 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.25 104.977214359 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 7.25397266985 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269462857125 0.242375264174 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850169279167 0.0925447433944 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506901784728 0.071462118173 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147648066934 0.151781067708 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.077089236079 0.0609392437508 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.