Recently, the phenomenon of learning more than one language has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “would it be important in the future?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that the ability to communicate in more than one language is vital, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the communicative standpoint, the effective communication is bound up inextricably with the people’s command of language, which indicates they lead to both power of expression and sharing opinions. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between social networking and broadening horizon as well as an exponential increase in multinational interactions. Their academic criticism was impressive. Researchers, nevertheless, paid heed to more job opportunities, business links, and future prosperity alike. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of better global understanding is correlated positively with not only the international co-operation but also command of a dominant language.
Within the realm of society and education, without the slightest doubt, mastering a common language attribute to language barrier elimination, in that it would come down to the less cultural shock, social customs, and cultural diversity. A salient example of such attribution is the bilingual education, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take the language acquisition for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint the studying abroad problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to the social conversation, global training, and even being up-to-date. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of sociocultural aspects of being multilingual.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that in the future being bilingual or multilingual will be more important than it is now. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
- The map below shows the development of a seaside village between 1995 and present Write a short report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 61
- We should introduce laws to make businesses and state services employ equal numbers of male and female workers in every department or area of the company 78
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person Give reasons f 84
- Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 84
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in future Do you agree or disagree 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, nevertheless, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 20.9802955665 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 31.9359605911 147% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2062.0 1207.87684729 171% => OK
No of words: 363.0 242.827586207 149% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68044077135 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 3.92707691288 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30414100529 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 139.433497537 158% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606060606061 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 641.7 379.143842365 169% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.5262132529 50.4703680194 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.875 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6875 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5625 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246023648723 0.242375264174 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0667388695633 0.0925447433944 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0909391415216 0.071462118173 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154619218821 0.151781067708 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133595461269 0.0609392437508 219% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 55.0591133005 231% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.