Advances in technology and automation have reduced the need for manual labour.
Therefore working hours should be reduced. To what extent do you agree
Improvement and advancement in the technology and automation is clearly depicted. Nowadays, less time is required to perform a job. These days, there is an ongoing debate that working hours should be reduced as automation and technology have reduced the time required to do the job. In this essay, I will discuss my point of view by giving supportive examples.
Businessman claims that employees should spend same amount of time which was spent before the technology era. Before technology era it was industrial era, in which employees were required to do hard work and spent around twelve hours a days. For instance, according to study done in United Nations, revealed that employees daily working hours before 1900 was approximately twelve hours a day. However, as the technology advancement has been on its verge the working hours should be reduced.
Similarly, reducing working hour will have significant impact on the health of the human. Employees will have better social, mental and physical health. For example, a survey done in early 21st century showed that people who have less working hours are happier and enjoying healthy life. Hence, the businessman, government institutes and other organization should think seriously about the working hours.
In a nutshell, with the advancement in the technology and automation, the time to complete the job is reduced. Thus, working hours should be decreased. The essay discussed the main advantage of reducing working hours and the reason why it is not changed until now.
Comments
Recently, the phenomenon of…
Recently, the phenomenon of Advances in technology and automation have reduced the need for manual labour.
Therefore working hours should be reduced and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that develop technology can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, reducing labor force can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, T4 might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of T5 far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 235, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
...hard work and spent around twelve hours a days. For instance, according to study done ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, similarly, so, thus, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1291.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 245.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2693877551 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70974301463 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 139.433497537 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563265306122 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 379.143842365 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.0249737152 50.4703680194 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0666666667 104.977214359 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3333333333 20.9669160288 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366646762264 0.242375264174 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132497191065 0.0925447433944 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.098339941792 0.071462118173 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230803661895 0.151781067708 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308369826929 0.0609392437508 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 12.6369458128 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.1260098522 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 55.0591133005 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.