Over the past few decades, there has been a high degree of the ambivalence over this matter, whether air travel can only benefit the richest people in the world, and ordinary people can not get advantages from it. Whereas some people agree with this thought, I sanguinely disagree with it. This essay will further discuss reasons to support this notion and then deduce a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriads of reasons to support this notion, but one of the most compelling reason is that the air travel has made long-distance travel possible. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed research which revealed that air travel is benefiting the ordinary people as well. Thus, the beneficial ramification of air travel apparently can be seen.
On the contrary, skeptics conjecture that air travel is expensive and not everyone can afford it, which makes air travel beneficial for the rich people only. Although it seems ostensibly veridical, this is the one-sided story. As a tangible example, research conducted by a reputed organization reveal that air travel has become cheap over the past few years, and most flyers now are from the lower income group only. Hence, It is correct to presume a preconceived notion of the skeptics.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments from both the side, I profoundly believe that the air travel benefits the ordinary people as well as rich. Not only does the air travel prove its significance, but also explains the benefit of using it.
- Write about climate Change? who is responsible Whether government or Industries? Why? 77
- Air travel can only benefit the richest people in the world. Ordinary people can get no advantage with the development of air travel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- Do you think formal written assessments in today's world to assess students’ performance is effective or not? Discuss your viewpoint on this and support your answer with examples. 70
- Some people think imported food exerts positive impacts on our lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- the environment we live in is at stake due to a range of problems. What are the underlying causes? Who is responsible to combat this? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 149, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...air travel benefits the ordinary people as well as rich. Not only does the air travel prov...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, then, thus, well, whereas, while, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1297.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 257.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.046692607 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66699090117 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56420233463 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5461835025 50.4703680194 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.083333333 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.25397266985 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.448080375219 0.242375264174 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159653445366 0.0925447433944 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122778797992 0.071462118173 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.283769805527 0.151781067708 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548280305567 0.0609392437508 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.5310837438 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.