With all the troubles in the world today, money spent on space exploration is a complete waste. The money could be better spent on other things. To what extent do you agree or disagree? (Give reasons for your answer and give any relevant example or experience you have to support your answer.)
Recently, the money spent on space exploration has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “do the money spent on space exploration is a complete waste?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that the money could be better spent on other things, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the scientific standpoint, spatial strategies are bound up inextricably with creation of universe, which indicates they lead to both the Milky Way and the Big Bang theory. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between scientific achievements and advancements as well as an exponential increase in major profits. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of dramatic impact is correlated positively with not only forming public attitude but also regulatory policy reform.
Within the realm of space exploration, without the slightest doubt, space shuttles attribute to exorbitant budgets, in that it would come down to governors, scientists, and elites. A salient example of such attribution is a hidden agenda, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take an alternative solution for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint current system problems. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of surveillance.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the advantages of spending money on space exploration outweigh its disadvantages. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58020477816 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16386486528 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 139.433497537 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.682593856655 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0514572246 50.4703680194 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.769230769 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5384615385 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224278292597 0.242375264174 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601034050661 0.0925447433944 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0853450809818 0.071462118173 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12947137648 0.151781067708 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121575233568 0.0609392437508 200% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 55.0591133005 200% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.