Any new technological development in recent years is a boosting or drag for the society in general. Do you agree or disagree that mass media, like TV, radio and newspaper have a huge impact on people, especially young generation? What is your opinion? Provide reason and/or examples from your own experience or observations.
One of the conspicuous trends of today's world is a colossal upsurge in the ongoing trend of advance technological development is boosting up in the inhabitant around the world, be it an affluent or impoverished nation. Some people believes that radio, newspaper and TV having huge impact on young adolescence, while others disagree. This essay will present an overview of both the good and bad impacts and suggest some potential solutions.
At the outset, there are myriad reasons of this soaring concern. Firstly, in today's advancement in technology is empowering the society with enormous ways and means of TV and newspapers throughout the world aid to know good and bad affects about the every activity online. For example, in country between India and Pakistan due to political issues lead to commence violence between countries directly shared over the News or televisions. It is needless to say that, mass media is a good source to know the daily activities of the ongoing things, happenings throughout the world.
However, there are some pitfalls that can easily overwhelmed the potential benefits of technological development over the society. The primary concern comes from the fact that, due to mass media TV and radio, articles or news results negative impacts on religious lead to violence. For example, in some countries because of negative and vulgar talk on religious matters causing to escalate the culprits act in the nation, thus resulting bloodshed and fatality. As such, it is crucial to avert newspaper and the government strictly to look into this matter.
To recapitulate from the aforementioned arguments, one can conclude that despite of having positive impacts of advancement in technology, but the upsides shall be closely to look into this matter to avoid negative results from watching TV.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 379, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'escalating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: escalating
...ulgar talk on religious matters causing to escalate the culprits act in the nation, thus re...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, look, so, thus, while, for example, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 8.36945812808 251% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 31.9359605911 178% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1814.0 1207.87684729 150% => OK
No of words: 345.0 242.827586207 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25797101449 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 3.92707691288 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86426681101 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 139.433497537 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568115942029 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 379.143842365 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0309332183 50.4703680194 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.375 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5625 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 7.25397266985 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384547803308 0.242375264174 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126380749795 0.0925447433944 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.166631512318 0.071462118173 233% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237689737258 0.151781067708 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.285771750619 0.0609392437508 469% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.