In this day and age, whether law and regulations would change human behaviour has become a heated debate the world over. Although contested by many, noticeable numbers of people hold true the notion that it would, which I opt to vigorously support. This will be analyzed in this essay.
For one, it is claimed that regulations may contribute to standardizing people’s habits. For example, in Iran, I can vividly remember that people didn’t use to fasten their seatbelts while driving until recently when actionable solutions such as strict rules and financial penalties were introduced, which, fortunately, act as a catalyst to correct the public’s driving behaviour. Thus, this example fortifies the argument that law can contribute to change in people’s habits and behaviour.
In addition, the law is supposed to be a contributing factor against the swelling crime rates. Take Arabian countries as an illustration. In these countries, a man’s hand will be cut if it can be proven that he committed rubbery. Therefore, these kinds of crimes and misbehaviours dramatically have fallen since the introduction of this regulation. This example clearly shows why the argument that law can change people’s behaviour has garnered support.
To conclude, after analyzing how law contributes to standardized conduct and the way it causes the crime rates to fall, it is now quite evident why I am highly inclined to believe it can change the people’s behaviour.
- Some people believe the aim of university education is to help graduates get better jobs. Others believe there are much wider benefits of university education for both individuals and society.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- Cities are now expanding; the government should make a better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or Disagree? 77
- Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. Discuss 85
- In many countries plastic bags are the main source of rubbish causing pollution in oceans and on land; therefore they should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping, etc. and whether you support them or not. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ividly remember that people didn't use to fasten their seatbelts while driving...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1265.0 1207.87684729 105% => OK
No of words: 233.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42918454936 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14885189972 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622317596567 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 379.143842365 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.7678690771 50.4703680194 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.416666667 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4166666667 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.25397266985 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175654924889 0.242375264174 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663419567864 0.0925447433944 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773132758825 0.071462118173 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113119674541 0.151781067708 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0122476452781 0.0609392437508 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 12.6369458128 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 55.0591133005 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.