Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping, etc. and whether you support them or not.

Recently, many people support dangerous activities, however, some other people have opposite view. In my point of view, there are several reasons to not support such these activities such as financial issues or being risky and harmful. I will discuss my reasons in detail throughout this essay.

From the financial standpoint, lucrative sports with high excitement emerged for tourists' attraction and financial profits. It means nobody cares how harmful it would be to body functions and the only magnificent issue would be the price. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic examination which discovered the countries that support adventurous sports were visited by young travellers in comparison with other countries. Thus, the beneficial consequences of tourists and flux of money apparently can be seen.

Secondly, the most important reason for refusing such risk-taking sports is its life-threatening feature. However, many believe that such these sports develop actor's self-confidence; I think it is not worth to bring chances of permanent injuries to your body for achieving some confidence. As a tangible example, a scientific research is undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that it is unpredictable to measure the reaction of the body during vigorous sports and it might cause serious injuries. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of sports addiction would occur.

To conclude, while there are several arguments on dangerous activities, I profoundly believe that gentle sports have significant impacts on human kind's health and delightfulness. Dangerous sports not only are harmful to the body, but also make adrenaline addiction.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 314, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'scientific research'.
Suggestion: scientific research
...some confidence. As a tangible example, a scientific research is undertaken by a prestigious universi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 147, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'kinds'' or 'kind's'?
Suggestion: kinds'; kind's
...ports have significant impacts on human kinds health and delightfulness. Dangerous sp...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, i think, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62357414449 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09956137514 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627376425856 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5970060102 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.769230769 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2307692308 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23076923077 7.25397266985 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0561638657385 0.242375264174 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0202850379135 0.0925447433944 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0284530152074 0.071462118173 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0397356167405 0.151781067708 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345253607887 0.0609392437508 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 12.6369458128 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.