Can the Internet replace the classroom teacher? Discuss your views.

Essay topics:

Can the Internet replace the classroom teacher? Discuss your views.

Nowadays, distance learning has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the world, which leads to a moot question, “whether the Internet can be replaced with classroom and teacher or not?”. It is a widely held view that studying by the Internet and remote education is highly beneficial, whereas I tend to believe that one must weigh up carefully the pros and cons of this issue.

To begin with, it is a common belief that the Internet plays a vital role in the world of education. To put into consideration, I express several reasons why I support this idea. First and foremost is that those who are an employer and are not able to attend the classroom can learn everywhere and at their own convenience time. Secondly. It can be argued that the sessions are recorded and they can listen to their course numerous time. In addition to this information, it should be mentioned that learners study their lessons at their own pace. A very tangible example of educating by the Internet is the interaction between the international students and professional tutors by E-mail.

However, there is no doubt that learning by the Internet provides people with various negative points. It should be taken into account that those students who attend in the classroom will be able to share their findings and have a face to face relationship. Moreover, the social skill is stronger in the classroom that studying on the Internet. Also, the questions of students are responded immediately.

To recapitulate, I firmly believe that replacing the Internet than attending in the classroom must be taken into consideration. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce stricter legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-31 manraj123 80 view
2019-12-27 bashirheidari 88 view
2019-12-12 yasamin.gharib62 85 view
2018-09-09 sunilkms 35 view
2018-06-18 IZAD 89 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user azzitta :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 40, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
Nowadays, distance learning has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, whereas, in addition, no doubt, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.5418719212 180% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 20.9802955665 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 296.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.125 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92196529906 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567567567568 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4497716112 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.357142857 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214336795583 0.242375264174 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711886494677 0.0925447433944 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670102140072 0.071462118173 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131617782257 0.151781067708 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329812205389 0.0609392437508 54% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 12.6369458128 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.