Cashless society is becoming a reality. More and more people are using credit cards for payment, and less people use cash. How realistic do you think it is? And do you think it is beneficial or problematic?
Nowadays, people become more aware that a cashless society is playing an increasingly important role in our daily life. While some people believe that it is becoming a reality, others oppose that it still has many problems. In my opinion, a cashless society is realistic and also advantageous in respect of this issue, which can be supported by the reasons as follows.
It is reasonable for me to believe that a cashless society is realistic, which is obvious because the service supporting electronic payment is very common today. To be more specific, in our daily consumption pattern, there are many services such as Apple Pay, mobile payment, and POS machines that are very useful and popular. A recent study from Oxford University can prove this. The study pointed out that 76% of living bills are paid online instead of cash.
Besides, this phenomenon also has many advantages, which is reasonable because it can shorten transaction time and improve the purchasing process efficiency. To illustrate, people do not have to wait for change when pay by electronic consumption, thus keep the queue moving quickly. To further support the above statement, it took me five minutes to finish the transaction in the supermarket when I used cash to pay, while it only takes me thirty seconds when I use a credit card now.
In a nutshell, although this controversial topic never fails to attract public attention, we may safely conclude that a cashless society is a reality and has many benefits.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, may, second, so, still, thus, while, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 31.9359605911 69% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1253.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 249.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03212851406 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75932549648 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618473895582 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6284232206 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.909090909 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6363636364 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09090909091 7.25397266985 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232119599853 0.242375264174 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0752466311737 0.0925447433944 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504584904444 0.071462118173 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12368636463 0.151781067708 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432790241895 0.0609392437508 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.5310837438 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.